Schenck v. County of Sonoma

In an appeal from a judgment in an action challenging the approval of a project for development of a beverage distribution facility on grounds that defendant-county failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Pub. Resources Code, section 21000 et seq., judgment of the trial court is affirmed where a single error in the notice procedure was not prejudicial, and the substantial evidence does not support plaintiff’s position that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment.