In an appeal from a judgment of the district court invalidating defendant-Forest Service’s Travel Management Plan for parts of the Lewis and Clark National Forest, judgment is reversed because: 1) the Montana Wilderness Study Act does not bar the defendant from exercising its discretion to enhance the wilderness character of a study area; and 2) the NEPA does not require the defendant to prepare a supplemental draft environmental impact statement (EIS) where the final decision makes only minor changes and is qualitatively within the spectrum of the alternatives discussed in the draft EIS.
A Reputation For-Integrity And Excellence
A Reputation For-Integrity And Excellence
- Home
- »
- Environmental Law
- »
- Russell Country Sportsmen v. US Forest Service
Russell Country Sportsmen v. US Forest Service
On Behalf of Herrera Law & Associates, PLLC | Oct 12, 2020 | Environmental Law